A few months ago, Noodle industry was facing disputes with Food safety authorities on matter of excess ash content in their food product. It has been reported in news that one of the adjudicating officers at state level has imposed penalty under Food Safety and Standards Act on the manufacturer for excess ‘ash content’. As per the food authorities, the samples of the noodles tested contained more ash content than the maximum prescribed limit.
These reports were shocking revelation to consumers and a number of questions come to our mind. The first and foremost, why at all should ‘ash content’ be allowed in any kind of food? Now, let us be clear, that the presence of ash does not mean that ash in a literal sense. Ash refers to any inorganic material, such as minerals, present in food. It is called ash because it is the residue that remains after removing water and organic materials such as fat and protein. Ash can include both compounds with essential minerals, such as calcium and potassium, and toxic materials, such as lead. Therefore, the presence of ash does not mean that ash in a literal sense is allowed to be added to a food product. The parameter of ‘ash content’ is important for noodle products because it is normally made of maida that does not contain outer part of the wheat which majorly contributes to ash content. That is the reason why total ash content limit for ‘atta’ is 2% but for suji, rawa and pasta products it is 1%. While testing noodle what needs to be kept in mind is that the limit is prescribed for noodle cake only and not for tastemaker.
The second question is what effect the excess ash can have on a consumer. The ash content has been reported to be in the range of 1-3% in these products. However, no need to press the panic button. It needs to be mentioned that in many standardized food items, it has been allowed in the much higher range of 5-9%. Therefore, ash content exceeding 1% does not necessarily mean that the food is unsafe and it will have an adverse impact on the consumer. It only implies that the food product cannot be named ‘noodle’ which seems to fall under a standardized food category of ‘pasta or macaroni products’.
Having understood the relevance of ‘ash content’, lets now understand the legal aspect of this dispute. Important factual aspect of these dispute is that the ‘ash content’ limit was applied not only on the noodle cake but also the tastemaker which accompanied it in the package & the violations have been reported with respect to tastemaker. The general defense of the manufacturer would be that the during the relevant time there was no standard prescribed for the tastemaker and the food analyst has wrongly applied ‘ash content’ limit on tastemaker which accompanies the noodle cake under the package.
In support of this reliance would be placed on various documents issued or circulated by FSSAI. such as, minutes of the meeting of Food Authority which reflected that the FSSAI had approved the food standards for seasoning for the first time.
Also, earlier this year FSSAI brought in amendment under Food Safety and Standards (Food Products Standards and Food Additives) Regulations, 2016 to introduce standards for seasoning for the first time wherein the parameter given is Acid Insoluble Ash in dilute HCL % (on dry basis) (Maximum); whereas, in the current set of cases ash content had been tested for total Ash on dry basis.
|IIFPT to launch machine for obtaining coconut sap|
|Centre to promote nutrition, health in tribal schools|
|Soy diets might help combat negative effects of menopause on health|
|Global Food Companies team up with IBM's Blockchain System|
|Reproduction in whole or in part in
any form or medium without
written permission is prohibited..